Child pages
  • Annotations for ACRIN-HNSCC-FDG-PET/CT Collection (ACRIN 6685-Tumor-Annotations)

Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

...

Excerpt

This dataset contains image annotations derived from the NCI Clinical Trial "ACRIN-HNSCC-FDG-PET/CT (ACRIN 6685)”.  This dataset was generated as part of an NCI project to augment TCIA datasets with annotations that will improve their value for cancer researchers and AI developers.

Annotation Protocol

For each patient, all scans were reviewed to identify and annotate the clinically relevant time points and sequences/series. In a typical patient all available time points were annotated. The following annotation rules were followed:

  1. PERCIST criteria was followed for PET imaging. Specifically, the lesions estimated to have the most elevated SUVmax were annotated.
  2. RECIST 1.1 was otherwise generally followed for MR and CT imaging. A maximum of 5 lesions were annotated per patient scan (timepoint); no more than 2 per organ. The same 5 lesions were annotated at each time point. Lymph nodes were annotated if >1 cm in short axis. Other lesions were annotated if >1 cm.  If the primary lesion is < 1 cm, it was still annotated.
  3. Three-dimensional segmentations of lesions were created in the axial plane. If no axial plane was available, lesions were annotated in the coronal plane.
  4. MRIs were annotated using the T1-weighted axial post contrast sequence.
    , fat saturated if available.
  5. CTs were annotated using the axial post contrast series. If not available, the non contrast series were annotated.
  6. PET/CTs were annotated on the CT and attenuation corrected PET images.
  7. If the post contrast CT was performed the same day as the PET/CT, the non contrast CT portion of the PET/CT was not annotatedSome lesions may cross multiple exams (ie. an MRI of the head and an MRI of the neck). The images portions on each exam were then annotated. If, however, the complete lesion was visualized on either a neck or head exam, then the other exam was not annotated to avoid redundancy.
  8. Lesions were labeled separately.
  9. The volume of each annotated lesion was calculated and reported in cubic centimeters [cc] in a dataset metadata reportthe Annotation Metadata CSV.
  10. Seed points were automatically generated, but reviewed by a radiologist.
  11. A “negative” annotation was created for any exam without findings.

At each time point:

Volume calculations were performed for each segmented structure.  These calculations are provided in the Annotation Metadata CSV.

  1. A seed point (kernel) was created for each segmented structure. The seed points for each segmentation are provided in a separate DICOM RTSTRUCT file.
  2. SNOMED-CT “Anatomic Region Sequence” and “Segmented Property Category Code Sequence” and codes were inserted for all segmented structures.
  3. “Tracking ID” and “Tracking UID” tags were inserted for each segmented structure to enable longitudinal lesion tracking.
  4. Imaging time point codes were inserted to help identify each annotation in the context of the clinical trial assessment protocol.
    1. “Clinical Trial Time Point ID” was used to encode time point type using one of the following strings as applicable: “pre-dose” or “post-chemotherapy”.
    2. Content Item in “Acquisition Context Sequence” was added containing "Time Point Type" using Concept Code Sequence (0040,A168) selected from:
      1. (255235001, SCT, “Pre-dose”) (719864002, SCT, "Post-cancer treatment monitoring")(in this trial, both the CT/MRI and PET/CT, while being different timepoints, are pre-treatment

Important supplementary information and sample code

  1. A spreadsheet containing key details about the annotations is available in the Data Access section below.
  2. A Jupyter notebook demonstrating how to use the NBIA Data Retriever Command-Line Interface application and the REST API to access these data can be found in the Additional Resources section below.

...