- Created by natasha honomichl, last modified by Geri Blake on Nov 02, 2020
You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version.
Compare with Current View Page History
« Previous Version 88 Next »
Summary
The approved expert segmentation labels should enable quantitative computational and clinical studies without the need to repeat manual annotations, whilst allowing for comparison across studies. They can also serve as a set of manually-annotated gold standard labels for performance evaluation in computational competitions, such as the International Brain Tumor Segmentation (BraTS) challenge. The provided panel of robust radiomic features may facilitate research integrative of the molecular characterization offered by the Allen Institute, and hence allow associations with molecular markers (radiogenomics), clinical outcomes, treatment responses and other endpoints, by researchers without sufficient computational background to extract such features. The complete reproducibility analysis can be found in the associated publication citation found in the “Citations & Data Usage Policy”.
Specifically, the released data comprises of 1) the available expert segmentation labels of the various tumor sub-compartments performed at each institution (i.e. 34 subjects segmented at UPenn, 34 subjects segmented at CWRU), with a total of 37 subjects (including 31 paired segmentations performed at both UPenn and CWRU), in the original space they were created (i.e., SRI for UPenn and MNI for CWRU), with 2) their corresponding co-registered and skull-stripped structural mpMRI scans (i.e., in SRI for UPenn and in MNI for CWRU), 3) the paired expert segmentation labels that were available for the 31 subjects, all being co-registered in the SRI atlas, 4) the corresponding SRI and MNI anatomical atlas files that we employed, 5) the complete set of 11,700 extracted radiomic features per subject, for each of the 31 included subjects, 6) the metadata relating to the metrics we utilized for the evaluation of the inter-rater agreement, as well as 7) the parameters used for the radiomic feature extraction and the correlation analysis results for identifying robust radiomic features, for the 28 subjects, and finally 8) the specific identified robust/reproducible radiomic features. All image related files are provided in NIfTI format, while the metadata files are provided in tabular formats (.xlsx and .csv).
Data Access
Click the Download button to save the data.
Data Type | Download all or Query/Filter |
---|---|
Images (NIfTI, zip, 669 MB) MNI MR/Segs (CWRU annotations only) | |
Images (NIfTI, zip, 469 MB) SRI MR/Segs (UPenn & CWRU annotations) | |
Subjects' Meta-data (csv, 7 KB) | |
Radiomic Features and Reproducibility Evaluation on SRI data (zip, 17.2 MB) |
Please contact help@cancerimagingarchive.net with any questions regarding usage.
Detailed Description
The data comprises of expert segmentation labels from each institution (i.e. 34 subjects from both UPenn and CWRU, with a total of 37), along with the corresponding co-registered and skull-stripped structural MRI scans in the space they were created (i.e., SRI for UPenn and MNI for CWRU), and the expert segmentation labels for the 31 common subjects co-registered in the SRI atlas. For brevity, we have included the corresponding SRI and MNI anatomical atlas files that we employed, the complete set of extracted radiomic features per subject for each of the 31 included subjects, along with the parameters used for the radiomic feature extraction and the correlation analysis results for identifying robust radiomic features, and finally, the identified robust radiomic features.
Citations & Data Usage Policy
Users of this data must abide by the TCIA Data Usage Policy and the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License under which it has been published. Attribution should include references to the following citations:
Data Citation
Pati, S., Verma, R., Akbari, H., Bilello, M., Hill, V.B., Sako, C., Correa, R., Beig, N., Venet, L., Thakur, S., Serai, P., Ha, S.M., Blake, G.D., Shinohara, R.T., Tiwari, P., Bakas, S. (2020). Data from the Multi-Institutional Paired Expert Segmentations and Radiomic Features of the Ivy GAP Dataset. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7937/9j41-7d44.
Publication Citation
Pati, S., Verma, R., Akbari, H., Bilello, M., Hill, V.B., Sako, C., Correa, R., Beig, N., Venet, L., Thakur, S., Serai, P., Ha, S.M., Blake, G.D., Shinohara, R.T., Tiwari, P., Bakas, S. (2020). Reproducibility analysis of multi-institutional paired expert annotations and radiomic features of the Ivy Glioblastoma Atlas Project (Ivy GAP) dataset. Medical Physics TCIA Special Issue, In Press, 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/mp.14556.
TCIA Citation
Clark K, Vendt B, Smith K, Freymann J, Kirby J, Koppel P, Moore S, Phillips S, Maffitt D, Pringle M, Tarbox L, Prior F. The Cancer Imaging Archive (TCIA): Maintaining and Operating a Public Information Repository, Journal of Digital Imaging, Volume 26, Number 6, December, 2013, pp 1045-1057. DOI: 10.1007/s10278-013-9622-7
Grant Acknowledgement
- National Institutes of Health (NIH) under award number NCI:U01CA242871
- Department of Defense (DoD) Peer Reviewed Cancer Research Program (W81XWH-18-1-0404)
- Dana Foundation David Mahoney Neuroimaging Grant, the CCCC Brain Tumor Pilot Award
- CWRU Technology Validation Start-Up Fund (CTP)
- The V Foundation Translational Research Award.
The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the NIH, U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, the DoD, or the United States Government.
Other Publications Using This Data
TCIA maintains a list of publications which leverage TCIA data. If you have a manuscript you'd like to add please contact the TCIA Helpdesk.
Version 1 (Current): Updated 2020/04/14
- No labels