Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

Summary

Excerpt

The RIDER Lung PET-CT collection was constructed as part of a study to evaluate the variability of tumor unidimensional, bidimensional, and volumetric measurements on same-day repeat computed tomographic (CT) scans in patients with non–small cell lung cancer.

Thirty-two patients with non–small cell lung cancer, each of whom underwent two CT scans of the chest within 15 minutes by using the same imaging protocol, were included in this study. Three radiologists independently measured the two greatest diameters of each lesion on both scans and, during another session, measured the same tumors on the first scan. In a separate analysis, computer software was applied to assist in the calculation of the two greatest diameters and the volume of each lesion on both scans. Concordance correlation coefficients (CCCs) and Bland-Altman plots were used to assess the agreements between the measurements of the two repeat scans (reproducibility) and between the two repeat readings of the same scan (repeatability).

shared to facilitate the RIDER PET/CT subgroup activities. The PET/CT subgroup was responsible for: (1) archiving de-identified DICOM serial PET/CT phantom and lung cancer patient data in a public database to provide a resource for the testing and development of algorithms and imaging tools used for assessing response to therapy, (2) conducting multiple serial imaging studies of a long half-life phantom to assess systemic variance in serial PET/CT scans that is unrelated to response, and (3) identifying and recommending methods for quantifying sources of variance in PET/CT imaging with the goal of defining the change in PET measurements that may be unrelated to response to therapy, thus defining the absolute minimum effect size that should be used in the design of clinical trials using PET measurements as end points.

 

The reproducibility and repeatability of the three radiologists' measurements were high (all CCCs, ≥0.96). The reproducibility of the computer-aided measurements was even higher (all CCCs, 1.00). The 95% limits of agreements for the computer-aided unidimensional, bidimensional, and volumetric measurements on two repeat scans were (−7.3%, 6.2%), (−17.6%, 19.8%), and (−12.1%, 13.4%), respectively. Chest CT scans are well reproducible. Changes in unidimensional lesion size of 8% or greater exceed the measurement variability of the computer method and can be considered significant when estimating the outcome of therapy in a patient.

 

Localtab Group
Localtab
activetrue
titleData Access

Data Access

Choosing the Download option will provide you with a file to launch the TCIA Download Manager to download the entire collection. If you want to browse or filter the data to select only specific scans/studies please use the Search By Collection option.

Data TypeDownload all or Query/Filter
Images (DICOM, 7.55GB) 

Click the Versions tab for more info about data releases.

Localtab
titleDetailed Description

Detailed Description

Collection Statistics

Updated 1109/14/20132011

Modalities

CT, PET

Number of Patients

244

Number of Studies

275

Number of Series

1349

Number of Images

269,511

Image Size (GB)78.7
Localtab
titleCitations & Data Usage Policy

Citations & Data Usage Policy 

This collection is freely available to browse, download, and use for commercial, scientific and educational purposes as outlined in the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License.  See TCIA's Data Usage Policies and Restrictions for additional details. Questions may be directed to help@cancerimagingarchive.net.

Please be sure to include the following citations in your work if you use this data set:

Info
titleRIDER Lung PET-CT Citation

The Cancer Imaging Archive Team. Data From RIDER Lung CT. DOI coming soon.

Info
titleTCIA Citation

Clark K, Vendt B, Smith K, Freymann J, Kirby J, Koppel P, Moore S, Phillips S, Maffitt D, Pringle M, Tarbox L, Prior F. The Cancer Imaging Archive (TCIA): Maintaining and Operating a Public Information Repository, Journal of Digital Imaging, Volume 26, Number 6, December, 2013, pp 1045-1057. (paper)

 

Other Publications Using This Data

TCIA maintains a list of publications which leverage our data. At this time we are not aware of any additional publications based on this data. If you have a publication you'd like to add please contact the TCIA Helpdesk.

Localtab
titleVersions

Version 2

(Current)

: Updated

2014

2015/

11

12/

14

29

Data TypeDownload all or Query/Filter
Images (DICOM, 78.7GB) 
Version 1: Updated 2012/02/22

It was brought to our attention that RIDER-1817358092 and RIDER-2617411955 appeared to be the same patient.  We have gone back to University of Washington and confirmed this is to be true.  For now, we will leave both patients in place but plan to eventually delete RIDER-1817358092 has been removed as RIDER-2617411955 contains some contained a couple additional series not found in the other that were absent from the patient ID and is what we would advise users to utilize in their research.we removed

Version 1: Updated 2011/09/14

Data TypeDownload all or Query/Filter
Images (DICOM, 78.7GB) Image Added