Child pages
  • Breast Cancer Screening - Digital Breast Tomosynthesis (Breast-Cancer-Screening-DBT)

Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

Summary


Breast cancer is among the most common cancers and a common cause of death among women. Over 39 million breast cancer screening exams are performed every year and are among the most common radiological tests. This creates a high need for accurate image interpretation. Machine learning has shown promise in interpretation of medical images. However, limited data for training and validation remains an issue.

Here, we share a curated dataset of digital breast tomosynthesis images that includes normal, actionable, biopsy-proven benign, and biopsy-proven cancer cases.

A detailed description of this dataset can be found in the following paper:

Buda, A. Saha, R. Walsh, S. Ghate, N. Li, A. Święcicki, J. Y. Lo, M. A. Mazurowski, Detection of masses and architectural distortions in digital breast tomosynthesis: a publicly available dataset of 5,060 patients and a deep learning model. arXiv preprint arXiv:2011.07995.

Please reference this paper if you use this dataset. Please note that version 1 of the dataset contains only a subset of all data described in the paper above. More data will be share in subsequent versions.

The dataset contains four components: (1) DICOM images, (2) a spreadsheet indicating which group each case belongs to, and (3) annotation boxes

ExcerptIn this retrospective, institutional review board-approved study with a waiver for informed consent, we collected digital breast tomosynthesis volumes obtained from Duke Health System. The initial population included 16,802 studies from 13,954 patients performed between August 26, 2014 and January 29, 2018 with at least one reconstruction view available. From this cohort, we selected four groups of studies. Normal group included 5,129 screening studies from 4,609 patients without any abnormal findings that were not a subject to further imaging or pathology exams related to the study in question. Actionable group included 280 studies from 278 patients that resulted in further imaging exam based on a mass or architectural distortion noted in the study report Benign group included 112 studies from 112 patients containing benign masses or architectural distortions biopsied based on this tomosynthesis exam. Cancer group included 89 studies from 89 patients with at least one cancerous mass or architectural distortion which was biopsied based on this tomosynthesis exam. The above are excerpts from a manuscript which is currently prepared for a publication. We will be happy to provide the data inclusion/exclusion diagram and additional details regarding the selection

.



Acknowledgements

We would like to acknowledge the individuals and institutions that have provided data for this collection:

  • Duke University Hospital/Duke University, Durham, NC, USA

     - Special thanks to First Last Names, degree PhD, MD, etc from the Department of xxxxxx, Additional Names from same location.

    Continue with any names from additional submitting sites if collection consists of more that one
  • We would like to acknowledge all those who contributed to the curation of this dataset

  • This work was supported by a grant from the NIH: 1 R01 EB021360 (PI: Mazurowski).


Localtab Group



Localtab
activetrue
titleData Access

Data Access

Click the  Download button to save a ".tcia" manifest file to your computer, which you must open with the NBIA Data Retriever . Click the Search button to open our Data Portal, where you can browse the data collection and/or download a subset of its contents.


Data TypeDownload all or Query/Filter
Images (DICOM, XX.X GB)

 

Supplemental Data (format)


Click the Versions tab for more info about data releases.




Localtab
titleDetailed Description

Detailed Description


Image Statistics


Modalities


Number of Participants

5088

Number of Studies

22032

Number of Series


Number of Images


Images Size (GB)


Add any additional information as needed below. Likely would be something from site.





Localtab
titleCitations & Data Usage Policy

Citations & Data Usage Policy

Add any special restrictions in here.

Public collection license

Info
titleData Citation

DOI goes here. Create using pubhub with information from Collection Approval form




Info
titleAcknowledgement





Info
titleTCIA Citation

Clark K, Vendt B, Smith K, Freymann J, Kirby J, Koppel P, Moore S, Phillips S, Maffitt D, Pringle M, Tarbox L, Prior F. The Cancer Imaging Archive (TCIA): Maintaining and Operating a Public Information Repository, Journal of Digital Imaging, Volume 26, Number 6, December, 2013, pp 1045-1057. DOI: 10.1007/s10278-013-9622-7


Other Publications Using This Data

TCIA maintains a list of publications which leverage TCIA data. If you have a manuscript you'd like to add please contact the TCIA Helpdesk.




Localtab
titleVersions

Version X (Current): Updated yyyy/mm/dd


Data TypeDownload all or Query/Filter
Images (DICOM, xx.x GB)

(Requires NBIA Data Retriever .)

Clinical Data (CSV)Link
Other (format)


Added new subjects.

Version 1: Updated 2018/10/24

Added new subjects.