Child pages
  • Task-Based Anthropomorphic CT Phantom for Radiomics Stability and Discriminatory Power Analyses (CT-Phantom4Radiomics)

You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version.

Compare with Current View Page History

Version 1 Next »

Summary

The aims of this dataset are to determine the stability of radiomics features against computed tomography (CT) parameter variations and to study their discriminative power concerning tissue classification using a 3D-printed CT phantom based on real patient data. A radiopaque 3D phantom was developed using real patient data and a potassium iodide solution paper-printing technique. Normal liver tissue and 3 lesion types (benign cyst, hemangioma, and metastasis) were manually annotated in the phantom. 240 CT series with 8 parameter variations of reconstruction algorithms, reconstruction kernels, slice thickness, and slice spacing are available.

In a preliminary study, we showed that the 8 CT parameter variation pairwise group comparisons had statistically significant differences on average in 78/86 radiomics features. On the other hand, 84% of the univariate radiomics feature tests had a successful and statistically significant differentiation of the 4 classes of liver tissue. We concluded that the differences in radiomics feature values obtained from different types of liver tissue are generally greater than the intraclass differences resulting from CT parameter variations.

The phantom was printed using the Phantom X solution detailed in the study, "Radiopaque Three-dimensional Printing: A Method to Create Realistic CT Phantoms". It relies on inkjet cartridges filled with potassium iodide solutions (600 mg/mL) with prints realized on plain paper (80 g/m2). Stacked paper sheets result in three-dimensional phantoms.  Because the printing process is very specific to the Phantom X company and no other printer can be used, we did not made printer creation file publicly available.

This dataset can serve as a reference to assess both the discriminative power and stability of radiomics features with CT variations. In addition, it can be used to develop efficient data harmonization techniques to improve robustness of (deep) radiomics features and models.  Additional information and source code related to the project can be found at https://qa4iqi.github.io/.

Acknowledgements

We would like to acknowledge the individuals and institutions that have provided data for this collection:

  • This work was partly supported by the Swiss Personalized Health Network (SPHN) with the QA4IQI Quality assessment for interoperable quantitative computed tomography imaging project DMS2445 and the IMAGINE project. It was also partially supported by the Swiss National Science Foundation (SNSF, grant 205320_179069).

Data Access



Data TypeDownload all or Query/FilterLicense

Images, Segmentations, and Radiation Therapy Structures/Doses/Plans (DICOM, XX.X GB)

<< latter two items only if DICOM SEG/RTSTRUCT/RTDOSE/PLAN exist >>

   

(Download requires NBIA Data Retriever)

Click the Versions tab for more info about data releases.

Additional Resources for this Dataset

Note to curators! Use this any time you are linking to NCI's IDC/GDC/PDC resources.  The links below are examples and will need to be tailored to point to the specific dataset (see parameters in URLS).

Additional Resources for this Dataset

The NCI Cancer Research Data Commons (CRDC) provides access to additional data and a cloud-based data science infrastructure that connects data sets with analytics tools to allow users to share, integrate, analyze, and visualize cancer research data.


The following external resources have been made available by the data submitters.  These are not hosted or supported by TCIA, but may be useful to researchers utilizing this collection.


Detailed Description

Image Statistics

Radiology Image StatisticsPathology Image Statistics

Modalities



Number of Patients



Number of Studies



Number of Series



Number of Images



Images Size (GB)

<< Add any additional information that didn't fit or belong in the Summary section. >>


Citations & Data Usage Policy

Users must abide by the TCIA Data Usage Policy and Restrictions. Attribution should include references to the following citations:

Data Citation

DOI goes here. Create using Datacite with information from Collection Approval form

Publication Citation

We ask on the proposal form if they have ONE traditional publication they'd like users to cite.

Acknowledgement

Required acknowledgements only (ex:The CPTAC program requests that publications using data from this program...). If they just want to thank someone, that goes in the Acknowledgement section underneath the Summary.

TCIA Citation

Clark, K., Vendt, B., Smith, K., Freymann, J., Kirby, J., Koppel, P., Moore, S., Phillips, S., Maffitt, D., Pringle, M., Tarbox, L., & Prior, F. (2013). The Cancer Imaging Archive (TCIA): Maintaining and Operating a Public Information Repository. In Journal of Digital Imaging (Vol. 26, Issue 6, pp. 1045–1057). Springer Science and Business Media LLC. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10278-013-9622-7

Other Publications Using This Data

TCIA maintains a list of publications which leverage TCIA data. If you have a manuscript you'd like to add please contact the TCIA Helpdesk.

Version X (Current): Updated yyyy/mm/dd

<< One or two sentences about what you changed since last version.  No note required for version 1. >> 



  • No labels