The Cancer Imaging Archive (TCIA) Public Access

Space shortcuts

Child pages
  • Publications

Versions Compared

Old Version 107

changes.mady.by.user Fred Prior

Saved on

compared with

New Version 108

changes.mady.by.user Tracy Nolan

Saved on

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

...

  1. Kalpathy-Cramer J, Zhao B, et al. A Comparison of Lung Nodule Segmentation Algorithms: Methods and Results from a Multi-institutional Study. J Digit Imaging (2016). 29(4):476-487. (link)DOI: 10.1007/s10278-016-9859-z

  2. Parks CL, Monson KL. Automated Facial Recognition of Computed Tomography-Derived Facial Images: Patient Privacy Implications. Journal of Digital Imaging. 2016:1-11. DOI: 10.1007/s10278-016-9932-7

  3. Huang BE, Mulyasasmita W, Rajagopal G. The Path from Big Data to Precision Medicine. Expert Review of Precision Medicine and Drug Development (2016). 1(2):129-143. (link)

  4. Chatellier G, Varlet V, Blachier-Poisson C. "Big data" and "open data": What kind of access should researchers enjoy? Therapie. 2016 Feb;71(1):97-105, 107-14.(link)
  5. Benedict SH, Hoffman K, et al. Overview of the American Society for Radiation Oncology–National Institutes of Health–American Association of Physicists in Medicine Workshop 2015: Exploring Opportunities for Radiation Oncology in the Era of Big Data. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2016. 95(3):873-879 (link)
  6. Toga AW, Dinov ID. Sharing big biomedical data. Journal of Big Data. 2015;2(1):1-12.
  7. Moore SM, Maffitt DR, Smith KE, Kirby JS, Clark KW, Freymann JB, Vendt BA, Tarbox LR, Prior FW. De-identification of Medical Images with Retention of Scientific Research Value. RadioGraphics. 2015;35(3):727-35. doi: doi:10.1148/rg.2015140244.
  8. Mayo CS, Deasy JO, et al. How Can We Effect Culture Change Toward Data-Driven Medicine? Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2016. 95(3):916-21. (link)
  9. Kirby, J., L. Tarbox, et al. (2015). "TU-AB-BRA-03: The Cancer Imaging Archive: Supporting Radiomic and Imaging Genomic Research with Open-Access Data Sets." Medical physics 42(6): 3587-3587.  DOI: 10.1118/1.4925508
  10. GIllies RJ, Kinahan PE, et al. Radiomics: Images Are More than Pictures, They Are Data. Radiology, 2016. 278(2):563-77. (link)
  11. Fedorov A, Clunie D, et al. DICOM for quantitative imaging biomarker development: A standards based approach to sharing of clinical data and structured PET/CT analysis results in head and neck cancer research PeerJ, 2016. (link)
  12. Commean PK, Rathmell JM, Clark KW, Maffitt DR, Prior FW. A Query Tool for Investigator Access to the Data and Images of the National Lung Screening Trial. Journal of Digital Imaging. 2015:1-9. (paper)
  13. Bourne PE. DOIs for DICOM Raw Images: Enabling Science Reproducibility. Radiology. 2015;275(1):3-4. link. PubMed PMID: 25799330.
  14. Armato SG, Hadjiiski L, Tourassi GD, Drukker K, Giger ML, Li F, Redmond G, Farahani K, Kirby JS, Clarke LP. Special Section Guest Editorial: LUNGx Challenge for computerized lung nodule classification: reflections and lessons learned. Journal of Medical Imaging. 2015;2(2):020103-.
  15. Herskovits EH. Quantitative Radiology: Applications to Oncology. Emerging Applications of Molecular Imaging to Oncology. 2014;124:1-30.
  16. Gutman DA, Dunn Jr WD, Cobb J, Stoner RM, Kalpathy-Cramer J, Erickson B. Web based tools for visualizing imaging data and development of XNATView, a zero footprint image viewer. Frontiers in Neuroinformatics. 2014;8.(paper)
  17. Erickson BJ, Fajnwaks P, Langer SG, and Perry J. Multisite Image Data Collection and Management Using the RSNA Image Sharing Network., Translational oncology, 2014. 7(1):36-39. (paper)
  18. Prior FW, Clark K, Commean P, Freymann J, Jaffe C, Kirby J, Moore S, Smith K, Tarbox L, Vendt B. TCIA: an information resource to enable open science. Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC), 2013 35th Annual International Conference of the IEEE; 2013. (paper)
  19. Gutman DA, Cobb J, Somanna D, et al. Cancer Digital Slide Archive: an informatics resource to support integrated in silico analysis of TCGA pathology data., Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 2013. 20(6): p. 1091-1098. doi: 10.1136/amiajnl-2012-001469 (paper)
  20. Clark K, Vendt B, Smith K, Freymann J, Kirby J, Koppel P, Moore S, Phillips S, Maffitt D, Pringle M, Tarbox L, Prior F. The Cancer Imaging Archive (TCIA): Maintaining and Operating a Public Information Repository, Journal of Digital Imaging, Volume 26, Number 6, December, 2013, pp 1045-1057. (paper)
  21. Villani L and Prati RC. Classificação Multirrótulo na Anotação Automática de Nódulo Pulmonar Solitário. Congresso Brasileiro de Informática em Saúde (CBIS’2012). Citado na. 2012.(paper)
  22. Mongkolwat P, Channin DS, Kleper V, Rubin DL. Informatics in Radiology: An Open-Source and Open-Access Cancer Biomedical Informatics Grid Annotation and Image Markup Template Builder.Radiographics .2012. 32(4):1223-32. (paper).
  23. Jaffe, C Carl. Imaging and Genomics: Is There a Synergy?. Radiology. 2012. 264(2):329-31.(paper).
  24. Freymann JB, Kirby JS, Perry JH, Clunie DA, and Jaffe CC. Image data sharing for biomedical research—meeting HIPAA requirements for de-identification.Journal of Digital Imaging 25, no. 1 (2012): 14-24. (paper)

...

  1. Song SE, Bae MS, Chang JM, Cho N, Ryu HS, Moon WK. MR and mammographic imaging features of HER2-positive breast cancers according to hormone receptor status: a retrospective comparative study. Acta Radiologica. 2016:0284185116673119.

  2. McCann SM, Jiang Y, Fan X, Wang J, et al. Quantitative Multiparametric MRI Features and PTEN Expression of Peripheral Zone Prostate Cancer: A Pilot Study. AJR Am J Roentgenol (2016). 206(3):559-565 (link)

  3. Katrib A, Hsu W, Bui A, Xing Y. “Radiotranscriptomics”: A synergy of imaging and transcriptomics in clinical assessment. Quantitative Biology. 2016:1-12. (link)  

  4. Bai HX, Lee AM, Yang L, Zhang P, Davatzikos C, Maris JM, Diskin SJ. Imaging genomics in cancer research: limitations and promises. The British Journal of Radiology. 2016:20151030. doi:10.1259/bjr.20151030

  5. Zhu, Y., H. Li, et al. (2015). TU-CD-BRB-06: Deciphering Genomic Underpinnings of Quantitative MRI-Based Radiomic Phenotypes of Invasive Breast Carcinoma. Medical physics 42(6): 3603-3603.

  6. Tomczak K, Czerwińska P, Wiznerowicz M. The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA): an immeasurable source of knowledge. Contemp Oncol (Pozn). 2015;19(1A):A68-A77.

  7. Shinegare AB, Vikram R, Jaffe C, et al. Radiogenomics of clear renal cell carcinoma: Preliminary Findings of The Cancer Genome Atlas-Renal Cell Carcinoma (TCGA-RCC) Imaging Research Group. Abdominal Imaging (2015). 40(6)1684-1692. (link)

  8. Pope WB. Genomics of Brain Tumor Imaging. Neuroimaging Clinics of North America. 2015;25(1):105-19.

  9. Gutman, D. A., W. D. Dunn Jr, et al. (2015). Somatic mutations associated with MRI-derived volumetric features in glioblastoma. Neuroradiology: 1-11.

  10. Feldman, M., M. G. Piazza, et al. (2015). 137 Somatostatin Receptor Expression on VHL-Associated Hemangioblastomas Offers Novel Therapeutic Target. Neurosurgery 62: 209-210.

  11. Colen R, Foster I, Gatenby R, Giger ME, Gillies R, Gutman D, Heller M, Jain R, Madabhushi A, Madhavan S, Napel S, Rao A, Saltz J, Tatum J, Verhaak R, Whitman G. NCI Workshop Report: Clinical and Computational Requirements for Correlating Imaging Phenotypes with Genomics Signatures. Translational Oncology. 2014;7(5):556-69. doi: 10.1016/j.tranon.2014.07.007.
  12. Rao A. Exploring relationships between multivariate radiological phenotypes and genetic features: A case-study in Glioblastoma using the Cancer Genome Atlas, Global Conference on Signal and Information Processing (GlobalSIP), 2013 IEEE.
  13. Gevaert O, Xu J, Hoang CD, Leung AN, Xu Y, Quon A, Rubin DL, Napel S, Plevritis SK. Non-small cell lung cancer: identifying prognostic imaging biomarkers by leveraging public gene expression microarray data--methods and preliminary results. Radiology. 2012;264(2):387-96. Epub 2012/06/23.  (link)

Radiomics

  1. Korfiatis P, Kline TL, Erickson BJ. Automated Segmentation of Hyperintense Regions in FLAIR MRI Using Deep Learning. J Tomography, 2016, 2:4(334-340) DOI: 10.18383/j.tom.2016.00166

  2. Zheng C, Wang X, Feng D, editors. Topology guided demons registration with local rigidity preservation. Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC), 2016 IEEE 38th Annual International Conference; 2016: IEEE.

  3. Kotrotsou A, Zinn PO, Colen RR. Radiomics in Brain Tumors: An Emerging Technique for Characterization of Tumor Environment. Magnetic Resonance Imaging Clinics of North America. 2016;24(4):719-29.

  4. Zhao B, Tan Y, Tsai WY, Qi J et al. Reproducibility of radiomics for deciphering tumor phenotype with imaging. Sci Rep. 2016 Mar 24;6:23428. (link)
  5. Li H, Zhu Y, Burnside ES, Huang E, et al. Quantitative MRI radiomics in the prediction of molecular classifications of breast cancer subtypes in the TCGA/TCIA data set. npj Breast Cancer (2016). (link)
  6. Grossmann P, Gutman DA, et al. Imaging-genomics reveals driving pathways of MRI derived volumetric tumor phenotype features in Glioblastoma. BMC Cancer (2016). (link)
  7. Zhu Y, Li H, Guo W, Drukker K, et al. Deciphering Genomic Underpinnings of Quantitative MRI-based Radiomic Phenotypes of Invasive Breast Carcinoma. Sci Rep (2015). (link) 
  8. Rajakumar K, Muttan S, Deepa G, Revathy S, Priya BS. Intelligent texture feature extraction and indexing for MRI image retrieval using curvelet and PCA with HTF. Advances in Natural and Applied Sciences. 2015 Jun 1;9(6 SE):506-13. (link)

  9. Parmar, C., R. T. Leijenaar, et al. (2015). "Radiomic feature clusters and Prognostic Signatures specific for Lung and Head &Neck cancer." Sci Rep 5: 11044.

  10.  Parmar, C., P. Grossmann, et al. (2015). "Machine Learning methods for Quantitative Radiomic Biomarkers." Sci Rep 5: 13087.
  11. Tanougast C, Chaddad A. High-Throughput Quantification of Phenotype Heterogeneity Using Statistical Features. Adv Bioinformatics (2015). (link)
  12. Chaddad A. Automated Feature Extraction in Brain Tumor by Magnetic Resonance Imaging Using Gaussian Mixture Models.  International Journal of Biomedical Imaging, 2015. (link)
  13. Dhara AK, Mukhopadhyay S, Khandelwal N. 3d texture analysis of solitary pulmonary nodules using co-occurrence matrix from volumetric lung CT images. SPIE 2013. (link)
  14. Dhara AK, Mukhopadhyay S, Alam N, Khandelwal N. Measurement of spiculation index in 3D for solitary pulmonary nodules in volumetric lung CT images. Proc. SPIE 8670, Medical Imaging 2013: Computer-Aided Diagnosis, 86700K. (link)

...

  1. Jaffray D, Chung C, Coolens C, Foltz W, Keller H, Menard C, Milosevic M, Publicover J, Yeung I, editors. Quantitative imaging in radiation oncology: An emerging science and clinical service. Seminars in Radiation Oncology; 2015: Elsevier.

Theses

  1. Yu, Zexi. Co-Segmentation Methods for Improving Tumor Target Delineation in PET-CT Images. University of Saskatchewan 2016. (link to thesis)

  2. Albalooshi FA. Self-organizing Approach to Learn Albalooshi FA. Self-organizing Approach to Learn a Level-set Function for Object Segmentation in Complex Background Environments. University of Dayton; 2015. (link to thesis)

  3. Nabizadeh N. Automated Brain Lesion Detection and Segmentation Using Magnetic Resonance Images. Miami, FL: University of Miami; 2015. (link to thesis)

  4. Camlica Z. Image Area Reduction for Efficient Medical Image Retrieval. Waterloo, Ontario, Canada,: University of Waterloo; 2015. (link to thesis)

  5. Hunter L. Radiomics of NSCLC: Quantitative CT Image Feature Characterization and Tumor Shrinkage Prediction. Thesis, University of Texas; 2013.  (link to thesis)

  6. Karnayana PM. Radiogenomic correlation for prognosis in patients with glioblastoma multiformae. San Diego State University; 2013. (link to thesis)

  7. Nabizadeh, N. Automated Brain Lesion Detection and Segmentation Using Magnetic Resonance Images. Electrical and Computer Engineering. Miami, FL, University of Miami. PhD., 2015. (link to thesis)

  8. Wieser, H.-P.  Supervised Machine Learning Approach Utilizing Artificial Neural Networks for Automated Prostate Zone Segmentation in Abdominal MR images. Klagenfurt, Austria, Fachhochschule Kärnten/Carinthia University of Applied Sciences; 2013.(link to thesis)

...

  1. Aerts HJ, Velazquez ER, et al. (2014). Decoding tumour phenotype by noninvasive imaging using a quantitative radiomics approach. TCIA. Saint Louis, MO. (link)
  2. Armato SG and Drukker K, et al. (2015). SPIE-AAPM-NCI Lung Nodule Classification Challenge Dataset. TCIA. Saint Louis, MO. (link)
  3. Bloch N, Rusu M, et al. (2015) NCI-ISBI 2013 Challenge: Automated Segmentation of Prostate Structures. TCIA. St. Louis, MO. (link)
  4. Colen RR, Wang J, et al. (2014). Glioblastoma: Imaging Genomic Mapping Reveals Sex-specific Oncogenic Associations of Cell Death. TCIA. Saint Louis, MO. (link)

  5. Gevaert O, Mitchell LA, et al. (2014). Glioblastoma multiforme: exploratory radiogenomic analysis by using quantitative image features. TCIA. Saint Louis, MO. (link)

  6. Gevaert O, Xu J, et al. (2014). Non-small cell lung cancer: identifying prognostic imaging biomarkers by leveraging public gene expression microarray data--methods and preliminary results. TCIA. Saint Louis, MO. (link)
  7. Grove O, Berglund AE, et al. (2015). Data from: Quantitative computed tomographic descriptors associate tumor shape complexity and intratumor heterogeneity with prognosis in lung adenocarcinoma. TCIA. Saint Louis. MO. (link)

  8. Gutman DA, Cooper LA, et al. (2014). MR Imaging Predictors of Molecular Profile and Survival: Multi-institutional Study of the TCGA Glioblastoma Data Set. TCIA. Saint Louis, MO. (link)

  9. Huang W, Li X, et al. (2014). Variations of dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging in evaluation of breast cancer therapy response: a multicenter data analysis challenge. TCIA. Saint Louis, MO. (link)

  10. Jain R, Poisson LM, et al. (2014). Outcome Prediction in Patients with Glioblastoma by Using Imaging, Clinical, and Genomic Biomarkers: Focus on the Nonenhancing Component of the Tumor. TCIA. Saint Louis, MO. (link)

  11. Kalpathy-Cramer J, Napel S, et al. (2015). QIN multi-site collection of Lung CT data with Nodule Segmentations. TCIA. Saint Louis, MO. (link)

  12. Lee J, Narang S, et al. (2015). Spatial Habitat Features derived from Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging data from Glioblastoma Multiforme cases. TCIA. Saint Louis, MO. (link)
  13. Liu F,  Hernandez-Cabronero M, et al. (2016). Image Data Used in the Simulations of "The Role of Image Compression Standards in Medical Imaging: Current Status and Future Trends". TCIA. Saint Louis, MO. (link)  
  14. Mazurowski MA, Zhang J, et al. (2014). Radiogenomic Analysis of Breast Cancer: Luminal B Molecular Subtype Is Associated with Enhancement Dynamics at MR Imaging. TCIA. Saint Louis, MO. (link)

  15. Messay T, Hardie RC, et al. (2014). Segmentation of Pulmonary Nodules in Computed Tomography Using a Regression Neural Network Approach and its Application to the Lung Image Database Consortium and Image Database Resource Initiative Dataset. TCIA. Saint Louis, MO. (link)

  16. Morris E, Burnside M, et al. (2014). TCGA Breast Phenotype Research Group Data sets. TCIA. Saint Louis, MO (link)

  17. Roth H, Lu L, et al. (2015). A new 2.5D representation for lymph node detection in CT. TCIA. Saint Louis, MO. (link)

  18. Shinagare AB, Vikram R, et al. (2015). Radiogenomics of Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma: Preliminary Findings of The Cancer Genome Atlas-Renal Cell Carcinoma (TCGA-RCC) Research Group. TCIA. Saint Louis, MO. (link)

  19. Vallières M, Freeman CR, et al. (2015). Data from: A radiomics model from joint FDG-PET and MRI texture features for the prediction of lung metastases in soft-tissue sarcomas of the extremities. TCIA. Saint Louis, MO. (link)

QIN

  1. Kalpathy-Cramer J, Mamomov A, Zhao B, Lu L, Cherezov D, Napel S, Echegaray S, Rubin D, McNitt-Gray M, Lo P. Radiomics of Lung Nodules: A Multi-Institutional Study of Robustness and Agreement of Quantitative Imaging Features. Tomography: a journal for
    imaging research. 2016;2(4):430-7. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.18383/j.tom.2016.00235.

  2. Clarke, L. P., R. J. Nordstrom, et al. (2014). "The Quantitative Imaging Network: NCI's Historical Perspective and Planned Goals." Translational Oncology 7(1): 1-4. (link)

  3. Huang, W., X. Li, et al. (2014). "Variations of dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging in evaluation of breast cancer therapy response: a multicenter data analysis challenge." Transl Oncol 7(1): 153-166.

  4. Kalpathy-Cramer, J., J. B. Freymann, et al. (2014). "Quantitative Imaging Network: Data Sharing and Competitive AlgorithmValidation Leveraging The Cancer Imaging Archive." Translational oncology 7(1): 147-152.

  5. Levy, M. A., J. B. Freymann, et al. (2012). "Informatics methods to enable sharing of quantitative imaging research data." Magnetic Resonance Imaging.

...

  1. Yahya-Zoubir B, Hamami L. et al. Automatic 3D Mesh-Based Centerline Extraction from a Tubular Geometry Form. Information Technology and Control, 2016. 45(2):156-163. (link)
  2. Alazmani A, Hood A, et al. Quantitative Assessment of Colorectal Morphology: Implications for Robotic Colonoscopy. Medical Engineering and Physics, 2016. 38(2):148-154. (link)
  3. Gayathri Devi K, Radhakrishnan R. Automatic Segmentation of Colon in 3D CT Images and Removal of Opacified Fluid Using Cascade Feed Forward Neural Network. Computational and Mathematical Methods in Medicine. 2015;2015.
  4. Namías R, et al., Automatic rectum limit detection by anatomical markers correlation. Computerized Medical Imaging and Graphics, 2014. 38(4):245-250.(link)
  5. Boone DJ, Halligan S, Roth HR, et al., CT Colonography: External Clinical Validation of an Algorithm for Computer-assisted Prone and Supine Registration. Radiology, 2013. 268(3):752-760.(link)
  6. Roth HR, et al., External clinical validation of prone and supine CT colonography registration in Abdominal Imaging. Computational and Clinical Applications 2012, Springer. 7601:10-19.(link)

...

  1. Registration. Radiology, 2013. 268(3):752-760.(link)
  2. Roth HR, et al., External clinical validation of prone and supine CT colonography registration in Abdominal Imaging. Computational and Clinical Applications 2012, Springer. 7601:10-19.(link)

Collection: LIDC-IDRI

  1. Mhetre RR, Sache RG. Detection of Lung Cancer Nodule on CT scan Images by using Region Growing Method. International Journal of Current Trends in Engineering & Research. 2016;2(7):215-9. (link)

  2. Setio AAA, Traverso A, de Bel T, Berens MS, Bogaard Cvd, Cerello P, Chen H, Dou Q, Fantacci ME, Geurts B. Validation, comparison, and combination of algorithms for automaticdetection of pulmonary nodules in computed tomography images: the LUNA16 challenge. arXiv preprint arXiv:161208012. 2016:1-16.

  3. Firmino M, Angelo G, et al. Computer-aided Detection (CADe) and Diagnosis (CADx) System for Lung Cancer with Likelihood of Malignancy Biomed Eng Online (2016) 15(1):2 (link)
  4. Deep G, Kaur L, et al. Directional Local Ternary Quantized Extrema Pattern: A new descriptor for Biomedical Image Indexing and Retrieval Eng Sci and Tech, an International Journal (2016) (link)
  5. Wang W, Luo J, Yang X, Lin H. Data Analysis of the Lung Imaging Database Consortium and Image Database Resource Initiative. Academic Radiology. 2015.

  6. Sivakumar, S. and C. Chandrasekar (2015). "A Novel Noise Removal Method for Lung CT SCAN Images Using Statistical Filtering Techniques." International Journal of Algorithms Design and Analysis 1(1).

  7. Shen S, Bui AA, Cong J, Hsu W. An automated lung segmentation approach using bidirectional chain codes to improve nodule detection accuracy. Computers in biology and medicine. 2015;57:139-49.
  8. Messay T, Hardie RC, Tuinstra TR. Segmentation of Pulmonary Nodules in Computed Tomography Using a Regression Neural Network Approach and its Application to the Lung Image Database Consortium and Image Database Resource Initiative Dataset. Medical Image Analysis. 2015.(paper)

  9. Magdy, E., N. Zayed, et al. Automatic Classification of Normal and Cancer Lung CT Images using Multi-scale AM-FM Features. Intl Journal of Biomedical Imaging, 2015. (link)

  10. Lassen BC, Jacobs C, et al. Robust Semi-automatic Segmentation of Pulmonary Subsolid Nodules in Chest Computed Tomography Scans. Phys Med Biol (2015) 60(3):1307-1323. (link)

  11. Kumar, D., M. J. Shafiee, et al. Discovery Radiomics for Computed Tomography Cancer Detection. arXiv e-print, 2015. (arXiv link)

  12. Demir, Ö. and A. Yılmaz Çamurcu (2015). "Computer-aided detection of lung nodules using outer surface features." Bio-Medical Materials and Engineering 26(s1): 1213-1222.

  13. Kumar, A., F. Nette, et al. (2014). "A Visual Analytics Approach using the Exploration of Multi-Dimensional Feature Spaces for Content-based Medical Image Retrieval  IEEE J Biomed Health Inform (2014) 19(5):1734:1746 (pubmed link)

  14. Sivakumar S and Chandrasekar C, Lung nodule detection using fuzzy clustering and support vector machines. International Journal of Engineering and Technology, 2013. 5(1):179-185.(link)
  15. Gavrielides MA, Zeng R, Myers KJ, Sahiner B, Petrick N. Benefit of overlapping reconstruction for improving the quantitative assessment of CT lung nodule volume. Academic Radiology, 2013. 20(2):173-180. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2012.08.014. (link)
  16. Aggarwal P, Vig R, and Sardana H Patient-Wise Versus Nodule-Wise Classification of Annotated Pulmonary Nodules using Pathologically Confirmed Cases. Journal of Computers, 2013. 8(9):2245-2255. (link)
  17. Sivakumar S and Chandrasekar C, Lungs image segmentation through weighted FCM.Recent Advances in Computing and Software Systems (RACSS), 2012 International Conference. 25-27 April 2012 pages 109-113. IEEE. doi:10.1109/RACSS.2012.6212707 (link)
  18. Armato S, et al., Collaborative projects. Int J CARS, 2012. 7(1):S111-S115.
  19. Diciotti S, Lombardo S, Falchini M, Picozzi G, Mascalchi M. Automated segmentation refinement of small lung nodules in CT scans by local shape analysis. Biomedical Engineering, IEEE Transactions. 2011. 58(12):3418-3428. doi: 10.1109/TBME.2011.2167621. (link)

  20. Raicu DS, Varutbangkul E, Furst JD, Armato SG III: Modeling semantics from image data: Opportunities from LIDC. International Journal of Biomedical Engineering and Technology 3: 83–113, 2010.

  21. Zinovev D, Duo Y, Raicu DS, Furst JD, Armato SG III: Consensus versus disagreement in imaging research: A case study using the LIDC Database. Journal of Digital Imaging 25: 423–436, 2012.

...

  1. Gerstner ER, Zhang Z, Fink JR, Muzi M, Hanna L, Greco E, Mintz A, Kostakoglu L, Eikman EA, Prah MA, Ellingson BM, Ratai EM, Schmainda KM, Sorensen G, Barboriak DP,  Mankoff DA. ACRIN 6684: Assessment of tumor hypoxia in newly diagnosed GBM using 18F-FMISO PET and MRI. Clin Cancer Res 2016. Accepted.
  2. Gerstner ER, Zhang Z, Fink JR, Muzi M, Hanna L, Greco E, Mintz A, Kostakoglu L, Eikman EA, Prah M, Schmainda KM, Sorensen GA, Barboriak D,  Mankoff DA. ACRIN 6684: Assessment of tumor hypoxia in newly diagnosed GBM using 18F-FMISO PET and MRI. J Clin Oncol 33(Suppl):2024. 2015.
  3. Fink JR, Zhang Z, Gerstner ER, Muzi M, Kostakoglu L, Mintz A, Eikman EA, Barboriak D,  Mankoff DA. ACRIN 6684: Multicenter phase II assessment of tumor hypoxia in glioblastoma using 18F-Fluoromisonidazole (FMISO) PET and MRI. J Nucl Med 56(Suppl3):325. 2015.
  4. Fink JR, Muzi M, Peck M,  Krohn KA. Multimodality Brain Tumor Imaging: MR Imaging, PET, and PET/MR Imaging. J Nucl Med 56(10):1554-1561. 2015.
  5. Muzi M, Fink JR, Richards TL, Marro KI, Wong T, Muzi JP, Eary JF, Rockhill JK,  Krohn KA. Evaluation of PET and MR measurements to examine progression in glioma patients. J Nucl Med 55(Suppl1):1512-. 2014.


Collection:  QIN HeadNeck

  1.  

...

  1. Ahmadvand P, Duggan N, Bénard F, Hamarneh G. Tumor Lesion Segmentation from 3D PET Using a Machine Learning Driven Active Surface. MLMI 2016 in conjunction with the 19th Int'l Conference on MICCAI. (link) 
  2. Fedorov A, Clunie D, Ulrich E, Bauer C, Wahle A, Brown B, Onken M, Riesmeier J, Pieper S, Kikinis R, Buatti J, Beichel RR. (2016) DICOM for quantitative imaging biomarker development: a standards based approach to sharing clinical data and structured PET/CT analysis results in head and neck cancer research. PeerJ 4:e2057 https://doi.org/DOI: 10.7717/peerj.2057 (link)
  3. Beichel RR., Van Tol M., Ulrich EJ., Bauer C., Chang T., Plichta KA., Smith BJ., Sunderland JJ., Graham MM., Sonka M., Buatti JM. 2016. Semiautomatedsegmentation of head and neck cancers in 18F-FDG PET scans: Ajust-enough-interaction approach. Medical physics 43:2948–2964. DOI:
    10.1118/1.4948679.

Collection: QIN Prostate

...